MarcStevens | John seems to believe the law may be applied without any regard to evidence. He believes written instruments called constitutions and laws apply because judges say so; actual proof is not necessary. He even admits several times the applicability of law, jurisdiction, is only an issue of law, not evidence. He seems to accept that laws are magical, that there doesn't have to be evidence proving the laws apply. John insists there doesn't have to be any proof the laws actually apply. The law applies because men and women say so. We've heard this claim before.

OutsideTheRealityMachnine | Approaching the subject of human suffering and anguish, from an honest viewpoint, gives you all sorts of experience to explore: people are abused, they are minimized, they have severe nutritional deficits, they live in poverty, they are surrounded by the threat of violence, they receive poor and confusing educations, they are exposed to toxic chemicals and drugs, they develop weak immune systems, they don’t know how to cope with peer pressure to conform, they never learn what freedom means, and so forth and so on.

AE911Truth | In August of 2016, a former employee of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) began looking into the reports his agency had released years earlier on the collapse of the World Trade Center. What he found shook him to the core.

Everything-Voluntary.com | Legislation,” etc., is viewed to be inherently legitimate (authority) and obedience a moral duty. This rights issue can be dissected by outright asking the statist if “…law enforcement” have rights which no one else does, and/or if one is morally obligated to obey the law.

Everything-Voluntary.com | I can’t count how many times, or in how many ways, statists have tried to justify the violent authoritarian domination they advocate by saying that they’re only being “practical” and “realistic.” And that’s it. That’s their entire argument. They don’t even try to attempt to describe any principle by which being a parasitic aggressor could be a good thing. No, they just assert that that’s just how things need to be, because “real world,” and “grow up,” and “how things are,” and because peaceful coexistence and not being a violent, control freak bastard is (for some reason) unrealistic and extreme and Utopian.