AngryHateMusic | “In spite of the oxymoron in the expression, we propose to call this practice ‘after-birth abortion’, rather than ‘infanticide’, to emphasise that the moral status of the individual killed is comparable with that of a fetus (on which ‘abortions’ in the traditional sense are performed) rather than to that of a child. Therefore, we claim that killing a newborn could be ethically permissible in all the circumstances where abortion would be. Such circumstances include cases where the newborn has the potential to have an (at least) acceptable life, but the well-being of the family is at risk. Accordingly, a second terminological specification is that we call such a practice ‘after-birth abortion’ rather than ‘euthanasia’ because the best interest of the one who dies is not necessarily the primary criterion for the choice, contrary to what happens in the case of euthanasia.” – Journal Of Medical Ethics, 23 February 2012... - [More]

Posted: August 22, 2012 in Articles

MikeShanklin | What about those who believe governmnet pen-strokes have the magical powers to end homelessness, feed every child, stop all criminals, and make the world safe? There are no government magic wands, no governmnet sorcery, no government witchcraft, no government gods. What would a free society do with the insane?... - [More]

Posted: August 22, 2011 in Videos